Europe’s raving paranoia about genetically modified crops won out in a German court ruling against biotech company Monsanto. The country’s agriculture minister, Ilse Aigner, sponsored a ban on MON 810 maize, a GM crop designed to be resistant to pests. Aigner and others believe that GM crops in general are bad news and that MON 810 is particularly dangerous because it kills predatory animals as well as pests. There’s no real scientific basis for this, and MON 810 has been proven safe enough for other countries to allow it. But part of the court ruling against Monsanto’s motion for an emergency injunction against the ban stated that Berlin didn’t have to scientifically prove something was an environmental danger before banning it as an environmental danger. I’ll let that sink in. While it’s true that Monsanto and many other giant corporations have previously been involved in some horrendous and inexcusable environmental crimes, there’s absolutely no scientific or rational reason to outright ban GM crops. Further scientific study is always welcome, but the overwhelming majority of evidence so far points to GM crops actually being more humanitarian and environmentally friendly than traditional agriculture in many cases. GM crops are designed to produce more resilient yields in greater quantities. Yes, particular genetic strains can be patented, but that’s no different from any company selling seeds to a farmer. If more crops can be produced on less land, that means a smaller environmental impact and greater profits for the farmer. It also means more food for parts of the world struggling to survive with traditional agriculture. And if these plants can be modified to resist pests, that means less toxic pesticide needs to be used. It’s a win-win-win-win-etc., and the loudest complaints about GM crops come from people either pushing pseudoscientific, quasi-naturalist bullshit and/or anti-corporate, misinformed whining. A bunch of poppycock, I say. Also, if eating GM corn causes us to grow bat wings and prehensile tails, how could that possibly be a bad thing? More details here.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
GM Crops Take Another Hit
Labels:
Science
GM Crops Take Another Hit_t~~_http://amateurscientistblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/gm-crops-take-another-hit.html
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(394)
-
▼
May
(46)
- Talking About Mice
- Scientology Banned from Wikipedia
- Anti-GM Nonsense in Zimbabwe
- Faith Healing = Murder
- A Bigger, Better Thumb Drive
- Priest Shrugged Off Rape
- Genes of the Bearded Lady
- Standing Firm Against the Tide of History, Like a ...
- Horror and Superstition in Africa
- Maneaters
- Cancer Kid Update Update
- Death at First Bite
- Idiotic, Childish Congress Idiotic, Childish About...
- War on Drugs Called Off
- Cancer Kid Update
- Dobson Calls it Quits
- The Jenny McCarthy Song
- Life Found a Way
- Another Kid Dying Because His Parents are Supersti...
- Intelligent Women = Sexy Women
- Craigslist Shuts Down the Fun
- NPR Protecting Homophobic Privates
- J-Lo: The Voice of Reason
- Vampire Math
- Orgone Sabotage
- Holocaust Deniers Want to Friend You
- Spare Some Change?
- Portugal's Intelligent Drug Policy Pays Off
- Demon Waterboarded, Woman Killed
- Freedom on the March...Backward
- HuffPo Watch: Injecting Some Sense
- Bullied Into Psychosis
- GM Crops Take Another Hit
- Bachmann’s Greatest Hits
- U.K. Rather Confused About Freedom
- Bend Gravity at GameSnobs.com
- Autism Warning Signs
- Something in the Water
- Nothing to See Here
- When Our Powers Combine…
- HuffPo Watch: Premonitions and Other Nonsense
- Egypt Pigging Out on Swine Flu
- Europeans May Unlock History of Universe
- Religious People Love Them Some Torture
- Obama Not Asking or Telling?
- Gay Monks a Little too Swishy
-
▼
May
(46)